Wright-Patterson, 1948: o comando de material aéreo diz ter estudado cerca de 180 casos e desaconselha falar à imprensa

3 NOV 1948. SUBJECT: Flying Object Incidents in the United States. TO: Commanding General, Air Materiel Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio. 1. By letter dated 30 December 1947 from the Director of Research and Development, Headquarters USAF, your Headquarters was required to establish Project "SIGN". 2. The conclusion appears inescapable that some type of flying object has been observed. Identification and the origin of these objects is not discernible to this Headquarters. It is imperative, therefore, that efforts to determine whether these objects are of domestic or foreign origin must be increased until conclusive evidence is obtained. The needs of national defense require such evidence in order that appropriate countermeasures may be taken. 3. In addition to the imperative need for evidence to permit countermeasures, is the necessity of informing the public as to the status of the problem. To date there has been too little data to present to the public. The press, however, is about to take it into its own hands and demand to be told what we do or do not know about the situation. Silence on our part will not long be acceptable. 4. Request immediate information as to your conclusions to date and your recommendations as to the information to be given to the press. Your recommendation is requested also as to whether that information should be offered to the press or withheld until it is actively sought by the press. BY COMMAND OF THE CHIEF OF STAFF: C. P. CABELL, Major General, USAF, Director of Intelligence, Office of Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations. [P105530]

Basic ltr fr Hq USAF, 3 Nov 48 to CG, AMC, "Flying Object Incidents in the United States". 1st Ind. MCIAT/ABD/amb. Hq AMC, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio. 8 Nov 48. TO: Chief of Staff, United States Air Force, Washington 25, D. C., ATTN: AFOIR. 1. In attempting to arrive at conclusions as to the nature of unidentified flying object incidents in the United States, this Command has made a study of approximately 180 such incidents. Data derived from initial reports have been supplemented by further information obtained from check lists submitted by mail, from interrogations of other field agencies, and by personal investigation by personnel of this Command in the case of incidents that seem to indicate the possibility of obtaining particularly significant information. 2. The objects described fall into the following general classification groups, according to shape or physical configuration: a. Flat disc of circular or approximately circular shape. b. Torpedo or cigar shaped aircraft, with no wings or fins visible in flight. c. Spherical or balloon shaped objects. d. Balls of light with no apparent form attached. 3. Some of the objects sighted have definitely been identified, upon further investigation, as weather or upper air scientific balloons of some type. A great many of the round or balloon shaped objects indicated in paragraph 2c above are probably of the same nature, although in most cases, definite confirmation of that fact has been impossible to obtain. 4. Some of the objects have been identified as being astro-physical in nature. For example, in daylight sightings, the planet Venus has been reported as a round, silvery object at extremely high altitude. Action is being taken to obtain the services of a prominent astro-physicist as a consultant, to study all of the incidents to determine whether some can be identified as meteors, planets or other manifestations of astral bodies. 5. Arrangements for accomplishing a study of the psychological problems involved in this project are being made in coordination with the Aero-Medical Laboratory at this Headquarters. The possibility that some of the sightings are hallucinations, optical illusions or even deliberate hoaxes has been considered.

6. Although explanation of many of the incidents can be obtained from the investigations described above, there remains a certain number of reports for which no reasonable everyday explanation is available. So far, no physical evidence of the existence of the unidentified sightings has been obtained. Prominent scientists, including Dr. Irving Langmuir of the General Electric Company, have been interviewed to determine whether they could advance any reasonable explanation for characteristics exhibited by the objects sighted. In an early interview, Dr. Langmuir indicated that these incidents could be explained, but insufficient data were available at that time on which to base definite conclusions. It is planned to have another interview with Dr. Langmuir in the near future to review all the data now available, and it is hoped that he will be able to present some opinion as to the nature of many of the unidentified objects, particularly those described as "balls of light." 7. All information that has been made available to this Headquarters indicates that the discs, the cigar shaped objects, and the "balls of light" are not of domestic origin. Engineering investigation indicates that disc or wingless aircraft could support themselves in flight by aerodynamic means. It is probable that the problems of stability and control could also be solved for such aircraft. However, according to current aerodynamic theory in this country, aircraft with such configurations would have relatively poor climb, altitude and range characteristics with power plants now in use. 8. The possibility that the reported objects are vehicles from another planet has not been ignored. However, tangible evidence to support conclusions about such a possibility are completely lacking. The occurrence of incidents in relation to the approach to the earth of the planets Mercury, Venus and Mars have been plotted. A periodic variation in the frequency of incidents, which appears to have some relation to the planet approach curves, is noted, but it may be purely a coincidence. 9. Reference is made to "The Books of Charles Fort" with an introduction by Tiffany Thayer, published 1941, by Henry Holt & Co., New York, N. Y. It appears that similar phenomena have been noted and reported for the past century or more. 10. In view of the above, the following conclusions are drawn: a. In the majority of cases reported, observers have actually sighted some type of flying object which they cannot classify as an aircraft within the limits of their personal experience.

b. There is as yet no conclusive proof that unidentified flying objects, other than those which are known to be balloons, are real aircraft. c. Although it is obvious that some types of flying objects have been sighted, the exact nature of those objects cannot be established until physical evidence, such as that which would result from a crash, has been obtained. 11. It is not considered advisable to present to the press information on those objects which we cannot yet identify or about which we cannot present any reasonable conclusions. In the event that they insist on some kind of a statement, it is suggested that they be informed that many of the objects sighted have been identified as weather balloons or astral bodies, and that investigation is being pursued to determine reasonable explanations for the others. 12. A report, summarizing the results obtained from analysis of the data and a technical investigation of the engineering aspects of the objects described, is nearly complete, and a copy will be forwarded to your Headquarters in the near future. FOR THE COMMANDING GENERAL: H. M. McCOY, Colonel, USAF, Chief, Intelligence Department. [T-73017]

Investigation by United States Air Force of reports on so-called flying saucers has led to the identification of some of these objects as weather balloons and astral bodies. The investigation of such reported incidents is continuing at the Air Materiel Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio. [Incl. 2]

g. TO: Chief O.A. [handwritten] For verbal comment to Chief, OAI o/a 17 Nov. [initials] OAI. DATE 15 Nov. NO. 2. h. TO: General Cabell. DATE 19 Nov 48. NO. 3. 1. AFOAI recommends that no statement be released to the press on flying object incidents until press demands make such release imperative. 2. If the statement to the press is required it is recommended that Incl 2 form the basis of the statement. 3. We are prepared for the verbal comments at your convenience. [signature] for Gen Moore.