DIA, 2010: relatório do AAWSAP sustenta que “veículos anômalos” feriram testemunhas e tenta deduzir sua tecnologia pelas lesões

Anomalous Acute and Subacute Field Effects on Human Biological Tissues. Prepared by: Acquisition Support Division (DWO-3) Defense Warning Office Directorate for Analysis Defense Intelligence Agency. Author: [AAP Person 81]. Administrative Note. COPYRIGHT WARNING: Further dissemination of the photographs in this publication is not authorized. This product is one in a series of advanced technology reports produced in FY 2009 under the Defense Intelligence Agency, Defense Warning Office's Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. Comments or questions pertaining to this document should be addressed to [AAP Person 1], AAWSA Program Manager, Defense Intelligence Agency, ATTN: CLAR/DWO-3, Bldg 6000, Washington, DC 20340-5100.

Anomalous Acute and Subacute Field Effects on Human Biological Tissues. Preface and Summary. PREFACE. Several years ago three previous fit and active individuals experienced an anomalous [“irregular, incongruous and inconsistent with their domain”] aerospace-related event. Within 72 hours they suffered medical signs and symptoms [acute and subacute effects]. • These included almost immediate erythema (heat and redness) over exposed [to the presumed source of an electromagnetic radiation] skin, and varying degrees of the following as a function of their body-surface exposure times: fever, pain, headaches, numbness and parasthesiae, malaise, diarrhea, loss of hair and alopecia, skin eruptions/boils, cardiac palpitations, beginnings of what were to become chronic headaches and symptoms of insomnia and other sleep and dream disturbances, moderate to occasional severe anxiety and insomnia. Two of the persons also experienced photophobia (extreme sensitivity to light), dry and scratchy-stinging eyes, and extreme inflamed blood-shot sclerae (whites of the eyes) with soft tissue swelling of the eyelids. One of the three experienced moderate blood dyscrasia and signs of radiation illness, and over several years developed signs of malignant transformations. Extensive, but controversial investigations revealed the three had been subjected to an accidental exposure in the near-field [meters] to a broad-band ultrahigh radiofrequency mixed radiation of RF (radio frequency), NIEMR (non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation) & microwave energies [including non-specific and un-measured induced ionizing effects, probably mixed UVA, UVB and UVC (Ultra Violet A, B, C)] centered at about 785 MHz. • These three persons were antennae engineers subjected to an anomalous “accident” [1]. An extensive review of the medical literature and a compilation of a database has revealed an additional relevant but less dramatic 42 cases from the peer-reviewed medical literature, and an additional un-published similar 300 cases, primarily when fields were measured or emitters were known of mixed exposures of from 1-10 GHz at power densities of above 100 mW/cm2. SUMMARY. This paper relates, summarizes, and analyzes evidence of unintended injury to human observers by anomalous advanced aerospace systems. Additionally, an argument is made that the subsequent work can inform (e.g., reverse engineer), through clinical diagnoses, certain physical characteristics of possible future advanced aerospace systems from unknown provenance that may be a threat to United States interests.

The evidence discussed includes scientific material that has been peer-reviewed, contained in recently declassified government documents, and early emergent clinical medical analyses also underway in companion research studies. • Based on historical cases, humans have been found to have been injured from exposures to anomalous vehicles, especially airborne, and when in relatively close proximity. • The primary mechanisms of injury are related to electromagnetic radiation field effects (EMR field effects). • The biophysical characteristics of the injuries are well understood. • The energy related propulsion systems are not well understood. • The potential deployment of systems is thus important to understand. • Sufficient incidents/accidents have been accurately reported, and medical data acquired, as to support a hypothesis that some advanced systems are already deployed, and opaque to full US understanding. • Amongst the most important pathophysiological effects are: – Heating and burn injuries: o Ionizing and non-ionizing; o Thermally induced. – Neurological effects: o Cognitive / central nervous system; o Neuromuscular / central & autonomic nervous systems; o Sensory / peripheral nervous system; o Neuropsychiatric / neuroendocrine. – Auditory / cranial nerves VII & VIII: o Communication & disabling effects; o Noise and central neurocognitive. • Analysis of clinical diagnostic codes together with environmental conditions observed during anomalous events are clustered in meaningful ways. [p. vii] • The medical analyses while not requiring the invention of an alternative biophysics, do indicate the use of (to us) unconventional and advanced energy systems.

Chapter One: Definition of Topic and Domain of this Study. The objective of the overall program for which this paper has been prepared is to understand the physics and the engineering of advanced aerospace weapons system applications ...into the future, e.g., from now through the year 2050. This study addresses the clinical medical signs and symptoms and biophysics of injury known and expected from unintended exposure to anomalous systems. A. WHAT IS ADDRESSED IN THIS REVIEW. Advanced aerospace technologies, as with current technologies, often involve exposure of humans to exceptionally strong, and in the future to likely exotic, fields. This review is meant to cover the clinical medical injurious effects, including harmful psychiatric / psychological effects on the human organism that may be induced. Specifically, we are interested both in the more narrow scope of certain near-field heating and burn effects on “biological tissues” [usually human] and also systemic or internal medical / neurological / psychiatric injury or sequelae, usually modulated by neural tissue. “Near Field” is a term we intentionally leave as subjective. That is, we include effects of possible exposures that are within sight of the injured, and which are acute [within hours] or subacute [within days], but not longer chronic effects. Our working distance from the putative emitter is ‘10s of meters, and injury times are less than 10 minutes. We thus focus on the acute and subacute high-level, not chronic low-level exposures and effects. The most important bandwidth of interest is the range with tissue effects on humans: from about 300 kHz to 300 GHz; that is, from about 1 km to 1 mm wave lengths. In particular, we note that many of the effects on tissues {as currently with all environmental exposures of Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation (NIEMR), toxic effluents, and noise / thermal effects} are initially incorrectly adduced to be “subclinical” until chronic effects of low-level effects and/or accumulative doses are recognized. We will be particularly cognizant to not miss this subtlety in determining harm to persons in the near-field of possible advanced aerospace systems. We will not (except by reference) discuss ionizing radiation tissue effects, unless they are adduced to be “Mixed Field”, e.g. the Cash-Landrum case, vide infra). Therefore, since the potential deployment of advanced weapons technology is subsumed under this topic, of interest are not only side effects associated with possible lift/propulsion field mechanisms of advanced craft architectures, but also effects from advanced weapons systems as well. These include but are not limited to beam weapons, and active denial systems (ADS), including high powered microwaves (HPM). B. WHAT IS NOT ADDRESSED IN THIS REVIEW. We are aware of claims that some new and emergent systems may be intended to cause harm, and thus even be an intended weapon system. We make no attempt herein to validate any claims. There is ample precedent in US history for utilizing a separate analytic framework for Verification and Compliance issues, as in the lag in our recognizing Former Soviet Union and Chinese systems utilizing infrasonic, laser-blinding, and NIEMR weapons that went unappreciated by our intelligence agencies for two decades. Historically, the IC (Intelligence Community) adduces verification first,

claims of injury secondly, and compliance after lengthy state-sponsored discursive. We will not make that mistake. Beyond this, from a sociological perspective, expansion of this theme may also include the effects on humans en masse, namely inducement of hysteria, alteration or solidification of belief systems, alteration/destruction of social structures, group dynamics, etc., the analyses of which would require expertise in a great number of fields including sociology, anthropology, psychology, etc. This review will not critically evaluate epidemiological infectious disease or low-level electromagnetic radiation / RF aspects of certain exposures, except in passing.(i) We will not address psychophysics, paranormal, explicit pre-existing or chronic psychiatric, or abnormal psychological effects from exposures. {However, in the early draft of ICD-Code project in Appendix C, psychiatric diagnostic codes when made by a qualified physician, and medical sequelae from perceived abductions are included for completeness.} Chapter Two: Background: What is Thought to Cause Harm? It is well-understood that long-term exposure to even chronic “low-strength” as well as acute “high-strength” electromagnetic fields, ionizing radiation, intense lasers, etc., can have harmful effects on human physiology. {Terms defined vide infra} It is also known that EMR mechanisms can disrupt physiological and psychological functioning on a temporary basis. Emerging data support that some of the chronic low-level effects alter the ability of cells to function properly due to epigenetic effects {damage to the DNA / RNA protein regulatory pathways, independent of chromosome disruption}, and simultaneously alter the metabolism of dividing cells of (especially) the neuroimmune system [5,6]. The same holds true for exposure to toxic chemical, biological, or nuclear materials. A. SETTING THE STAGE: WHAT OTHERS HAVE SAID OPENLY ABOUT INJURY CAUSED BY EMR FIELD EFFECTS. There is relatively comprehensive literature on reported deleterious effects from exposure at close ranges to perceived anomalous aircraft of apparent advanced design [2,3,4,7]. Some of the claimed physiological effects include such phenomena as paralysis, electrical shocks, feeling of heat, burns, perception of odors, etc. Whether such effects are the result of unintended or intended harm to humans is yet to be determined, though evidence for the latter can be inferred in certain cases [8,9]. We will draw on that literature for selected cases, where exposure and emitter data are known or can be inferred, or where injury an be logically related to biophysical parameters. That is, it is of particular interest in a threat analysis program, regardless of whether anomalous-craft-induced physiological effects of humans are intended or not, to ascertain probable mechanisms, field strengths, etc., involved in the generation of the [footnote i: As an example, the enormous literature on the low-level and chronic exposure effects of ionizing, non-ionizing-UVA, UVB and UVC radiation will not be reviewed here. That literature is summarized well in http://www.cancer.org/docroot/ped/content/ped_1_3x_radiation_exposure]

unclassified US Government document that described precisely and accurately the nature of the Field Effects XXXX claimed existed [5]. It was a recent (1998), classified (until 2006) and controlled document: SECRET/NOFORN; Not to be disseminated to US Allies, NATO, or physically even be taken outside the United States except to secure US Embassy Military Attache Facilities. It was from a unit in the Intelligence and Security Command {INSCOM}, the US Army Analytical Element responsible for coordinated National Intelligence Community Assessments of military threat potentials ...based on current known worldwide (including US for benchmarking) research. It remains a bit murky as to how Mr. XXXX was able to “FOIA” (“use” the Freedom of Information Act) and obtain the document. Other “legitimate” researchers had consistently not been able to obtain it. The above vignette is offered, to make several points ... both administrative and subjective, and scientific ... and objective: • Classified information exists that is highly pertinent to the subject of this study, and only a small part of the classified literature has been released. • Yet, while directionally indicative of interest and intention to understand, the material does not rise to the quality of the initiative of the program in which this paper serves as one analytical example.(ii) • There is no evidence that the systems described in the document have been fielded. • The development of generators and aiming devices is not a rate-limiting issue.(iii) • There is no doubt that they would work. • The concerns, therefore, that individuals exposed to field effects as described in the document, and in this paper would suffer the claimed injuries ... are legitimate. Amongst the systems described are those of special interest in this effort: claimed injury from near-field exposures to aerospace anomalous vehicles and systems. As will be described, the pattern and circumstances of injury very often belie nay-sayer attempts to discredit witnesses, analysts, and those who suffer directly or indirectly from the systems. Even those who are, from time to time, delusional ...are not necessarily poor reporters of information outside their particular and personal delusion. Examples of systems the INSCOM analysis described as real and potential include precisely those asserted by good observers {and victims of injury} consistent with near-field RF/ EM/ NIEMR /Thermal/ Infrasonic/ and Coherent light-Laser effects: [footnote ii: This author once ran the INSCOM effort from which this FOIA'd document [5] derived, as the Assistant National Intelligence Officer for Science and Technology, and has recently chaired a DIA-sponsored 18-month Update Study at the National Academy of Sciences' NRC, (including classified research) published as “The military application of neuroscience research” [5-c] that encompasses virtually every aspect of the 2006 declassified INSCOM study.] [footnote iii: An electric field strength of roughly 100 kV/m over a time period of 1 nanosecond is approximately the condition thought to be necessary to produce the desired effect when provided to an overall repetition rate of 15 Hz. Such a field may be developed using a radar-like, high-peak-power pulsed source or an electromagnetic pulse generator operated at 15Hz. These technologies exist today. Aiming devices are currently available. The effective range could be meters, or even hundreds of meters [5].]

The electrophysiology should allow inferences to be made as to incident energies and bandwidths to the extent we can infer or discover the near-field RF qualitative and quantitative measures. What can not be overly emphasized, is that when one looks at the literature of anomalous cases, including claims from the most reliable sources, the extent and degree of injuries are consistent across patients who are injured, compared to witnesses in the far-field, who are not. For example, in the cases this reviewer has studied, the directionality and the times of the known RF/ EM exposures and the injury severity and patterns are highly consistent: There are no significant differences in either the reported acute effects (symptoms) or the physician-observed (signs) between the case of three antenna engineers and the Cash-Landrum cases. This pathophysiological observation is a convincing one: “Something” is causing these near field injuries, the energy deposition and conditions follow our “real-world” neurological experience. It seems highly unlikely that imagination or delusion of laypersons could mimic the science of thermal injury patterns, electrophysiology, immunology, and neurology in a non-linear dose-response manner ...and incorporate the biophysics of wavelength and eV effects (1 eV = 1.6 x 10-19 joules).

Appendix A: Schuessler Catalog of UFO-Related Human Physiological Effects (Frequency Distribution). The Schuessler catalog, UFO-Related Human Physiological Effects, was complied in 1996 by MUFON's past Director, John F. Schuessler. Covering the time period 1873 – 1994, the catalog comprises a summary of 356 selected cases of UFO-induced physiological effects on humans during close encounters. Physiological effects enumerated include such phenomena as paralysis, electrical shocks, feeling of heat, burns, perception of odors, etc. A compilation of the frequency distribution of these effects is enumerated below. The catalog thus constitutes a useful data base from which it is anticipated that certain physical source causes may be inferred.